Escalante 4
Escalante 4 revisits the connected feel of Escalante 1.5 for road running, speedwork, and walking. Updated engineered knit and a knit tongue create a soft, sock-like fit, while a revised footbed adds comfort. Less outsole rubber reduces weight and improves flexibility. Its 24 mm zero-drop Altra EGO platform combines InnerFlex grooves and FootPod construction for runs, commutes, and long days on foot.
- Intended uses:
- Daily, Walking
Specs
Among 865 listed shoes, this is a lower-stack Daily Trainer
- Weight
- 269g
- Of 811 known values: 369 lower, 8 equal, 434 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- Standard46th percentile (tie midpoint) / average +2g
- Drop
- 0mm
- Of 815 known values: 0 lower, 48 equal, 767 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lowerLower 5.9%, including ties / average -6.8mm
- Stack height (heel/forefoot)
- 24 / 24mm
- Of 694 known values: 33 lower, 8 equal, 653 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lowerLower 5.9%, including ties / average -10.7mm
- Carbon plate
- No
- 83% of 786 known models have no carbon plates
- Midsole
- Altra EGO
- Outsole
- rubber
- Reference price
- $130
- US price
Weight measurement and plate details
- Weight note
- Altra Japan official men's page lists 269g at US10.5 / 28.5cm.
- Plate note
- No carbon plate is stated in checked official product sources.
Related video
Shoe overview by Running Warehouse.
Compare within the database
See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.
Comparison: All data (865 shoes)
Position map
Weight x stack height
registered average: 265g / 34.7mm (686 shoes)
The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.
Spec distributions
Weight
This shoe 269g·registered average 267g (811 shoes)
Drop
This shoe 0mm·registered average 6.8mm (815 shoes)
Stack height
This shoe 24mm·registered average 34.7mm (694 shoes)
Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.