Skip to content
Running Shoe DB
JAEN
Back to list/New Balance/Fresh Foam X 880v15
New Balance

Fresh Foam X 880v15

Daily TrainerReleased 2025-03-07JP

Fresh Foam X 880v15 is a neutral cushioned model for runners from daily running through finishing a full marathon. It uses a Fresh Foam X midsole, a newly designed outsole, and recycled engineered knit mesh.

Intended uses:
Daily
2 sources · checked 2026-08-20

Specs

Among 865 listed shoes, this is a heavier / high-stack Daily Trainer

Weight
304g
Of 811 known values: 670 lower, 4 equal, 137 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
heavierUpper 17.4%, including ties / average +37g
Drop
6mm
Of 815 known values: 221 lower, 156 equal, 438 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
Standard36.7th percentile (tie midpoint) / average -0.8mm
Stack height (heel/forefoot)
40 / 34mm
Of 694 known values: 569 lower, 40 equal, 85 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
higherUpper 18%, including ties / average +5.3mm
Carbon plate
No
83% of 786 known models have no carbon plates
Midsole
Fresh Foam X
Outsole
-
Not registered
Reference price
$140
US price
Weight measurement and plate details
Weight note
Published sample weight from prior source pass; New Balance Japan official news checked here did not state numeric sample weight.
Plate note
No carbon plate stated

Compare within the database

See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.

Comparison: All data (865 shoes)

Position map

This shoeregistered average

Weight x stack height

registered average: 265g / 34.7mm (686 shoes)

The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.

Spec distributions

This shoeregistered average

Weight

This shoe 304g·registered average 267g (811 shoes)

97g375g

Drop

This shoe 6mm·registered average 6.8mm (815 shoes)

0mm13.8mm

Stack height

This shoe 40mm·registered average 34.7mm (694 shoes)

10.5mm58mm

Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.