GRVL CONCEPT
GRVL CONCEPT is a race-oriented model for routes that switch among pavement, gravel, and smooth trail. Dual-layer Energy Foam+ blends PEBA and EVA around a full-length Energy Blade carbon-fiber plate for cushioning and propulsion. Gravel-bike-inspired Gravel Contagrip adapts as surfaces change, while an integrated mini gaiter keeps debris out and redesigned Quicklace neo streamlines fit adjustment.
- Intended uses:
- Race, Tempo, Trail
Specs
Among 865 listed shoes, this is a lighter / high-stack Trail
- Weight
- 246g
- Of 811 known values: 219 lower, 2 equal, 590 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- lighterLower 27.3%, including ties / average -21g
- Drop
- 6mm
- Of 815 known values: 221 lower, 156 equal, 438 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- Standard36.7th percentile (tie midpoint) / average -0.8mm
- Stack height (heel/forefoot)
- 43 / 37mm
- Of 694 known values: 651 lower, 6 equal, 37 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- higherUpper 6.2%, including ties / average +8.3mm
- Carbon plate
- Yes
- 17% of 786 known models have carbon plates
- Midsole
- Energy Foam+
- Outsole
- Gravel contaGRIP
- Reference price
- $250
- US price
Weight measurement and plate details
- Weight note
- Per-unit weight from the Salomon Japan official unisex product page.
- Plate note
- Salomon Japan explicitly states a full-length Energy Blade carbon-fiber plate within a two-layer Energy Foam+ construction.
Compare within the database
See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.
Comparison: All data (865 shoes)
Position map
Weight x stack height
registered average: 265g / 34.7mm (686 shoes)
The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.
Spec distributions
Weight
This shoe 246g·registered average 267g (811 shoes)
Drop
This shoe 6mm·registered average 6.8mm (815 shoes)
Stack height
This shoe 43mm·registered average 34.7mm (694 shoes)
Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.