Wave Horizon 8
Wave Horizon 8 is a cushioned support shoe for larger runners who overpronate. Lighter than its predecessor, it combines an ENERZY NXT upper layer with ENERZY below. An asymmetrical Wave structure, enlarged medial rubber wall and broad outsole provide support. The stretch-woven upper helps hold the foot in position.
- Intended uses:
- Daily, Long run, Stability
Specs
Among 881 listed shoes, this is a heavier / high-stack Stability
- Weight
- 320g
- Of 825 known values: 763 lower, 12 equal, 50 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- heavierUpper 7.5%, including ties / average +53g
- Drop
- 8mm
- Of 827 known values: 414 lower, 243 equal, 170 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- Standard64.8th percentile (tie midpoint) / average +1.2mm
- Stack height (heel/forefoot)
- 41 / 33mm
- Of 697 known values: 616 lower, 21 equal, 60 higher. The marker uses the midpoint of equal values.
- higherUpper 11.6%, including ties / average +6.3mm
- Carbon plate
- No
- 83% of 788 known models have no carbon plates
- Midsole
- MIZUNO ENERZY NXT / MIZUNO ENERZY
- Outsole
- X10
- Reference price
- $170
- US price
Weight measurement and plate details
- Weight note
- The exact Mizuno Ireland page lists 320 g; sample size is not stated.
- Plate note
- No carbon plate is stated on the checked official pages. The official pages describe Foam Wave / Asymmetrical Mizuno Wave stability construction.
Compare within the database
See where these specs sit in the overall distribution. You can also compare within the same category.
Comparison: All data (881 shoes)
Position map
Weight x stack height
registered average: 266g / 34.7mm (690 shoes)
The scatter plot includes only shoes with both weight and stack height registered.
Spec distributions
Weight
This shoe 320g·registered average 267g (825 shoes)
Drop
This shoe 8mm·registered average 6.8mm (827 shoes)
Stack height
This shoe 41mm·registered average 34.7mm (697 shoes)
Items with missing numeric values are excluded. Sample sizes and measurement conditions vary between models; this distribution is not a performance ranking.